Considered a standard today,
meaning one of a series of books containing the teachings of modern prophets
that has been compiled and edited and approved, Gospel Doctrine was compiled as a means of getting President Joseph
F. Smith’s sermons into print for the benefit of members of the church in one
collection.
Because it has been known as a
standard collection of excerpts from a prophet’s sermons for so long, it is
little known today that some small controversy among the Brethren greeted the
first edition. The journal of Anthon H. Lund (one of Pres. Smith’s counselors)
states that: “Some of the Apostles met and discussed Pres. Joseph F. Smith’s
speech on Peter’s denial of Jesus and that it was not the unpardonable sin,
because he did not have the Holy Ghost bestowed upon him. We think that it
would have been better that this had not been put into a book for a text-book
to the Priesthood. (September 9, 1919)
“We met with the Priesthood
committee and talked over some points in Pres. Joseph F. Smith’s book used as a
text-book in the Priesthood quorum. His belief is that Peter’s sin would have
been a sin against the Holy Ghost if he had received it before hand, but as he
did not receive it until after the resurrection of Christ, his offense was
forgiven him. Also he holds that Judas not having received the Holy Ghost could
not commit the unpardonable sin. These two propositions were defended by Joseph
Fielding Smith Jr. and David O. McKay and Rudger Clawson. Pres. Charles W.
Penrose felt they should be eliminated from the new edition. The mode of
ordaining was also objected to as opposed to the Book of Mormon and to the
practice under all foregoing Presidents and Pres. J. F. Smith himself said that
he made no objection to the old method as it was just as good. There were
several other points raised but it was agreed to print a new edition with an
addenda printing the words of the President therein.” (September 10, 1919,
Anthon H. Lund journal)
No comments:
Post a Comment